Friday, May 30, 2008

Big Mike's Lil' Update 5/30/08

Wow, what a depressing week. Starting off with the passing of Sydney Pollack and now the sad news that there will be Beverly Hills Cop IV. Let's try to find some good news.


- Finally! Kevin Smith has posted a teaser trailer for Zack and Miri Make A Porno, starring Seth Rogen and Elizabeth Banks. People are curious to see how the different comedic stylings of Smith and Rogen will mesh, but if the teaser is any indication, it will be worth watching several times. Check out the trailer at Quick Stop Entertainment.



- Going to see The Strangers tonight, because, well, it's either that or going to see that movie about three hookers and their mom.

- Don't forget about Paul's Brain Trust. You can click on the link to the right to find out more information and help out while you can.

- Sadly, this week we also said goodbye to Harvey Korman. Korman won 4 Emmys for his work on The Carol Burnett Show and is best remembered for his work with Mel Brooks in High Anxiety, History of the World and of course, Blazing Saddles. Hedy Lemarr (that's HedLEY!) has always been my favorite character in the movie and whenever my friend Jamie and I break into our Saddles routine, he plays Mel and I play Harvey.



Harvey Korman was 81. Meeting adjourned.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Paul's Brain Trust

Not an update and not a regular blog post. This is more important that any of that.

Paul Prischman is a DVD producer who has worked on the DVD releases for Spider Man 2, American Gangster, Kingdom of Heaven, Monster House, Gladiator: Extended Edition, Revenge: The Director's Cut and my personal favorite Blade Runner: Ultimate Collector's Edition.

Recently, Paul was diagnosed with Grade 4 brain cancer. The subsequent treatment is costly and efforts are being made to raise money for his wife and children in their time of need. Paul's Brain Trust has been established to take donations and raise money. One of their events coming up is a special screening of Blade Runner: The Final Cut with Sir Ridley Scott in attendance.



I will be attending this screening as a friend has already purchased tickets for the event. Yes, I am not above making such a noble sacrifice like going to see an amazing movie with a master director on one of the legendary Hollywood studio lots. I would go anyway, but if the money is going for a good cause then I'm all for it. If you click on the image on the right hand sidebar, it can take you right to the website. I love movies and my blog, but if we can all pool our resources and do something worth while with it, then I think that's a good thing. I actually like to do a lot of work myself with unwed mothers. *cough stripclub


Please check out the website and donate if you can. Times are tough all over, but I think most of us live a medical emergency away from financial trouble, so help if you can. This man is beloved by his peers, as evidenced by the outpouring of support and I'm sure everyone who reads this owns at least something that he has labored on.


Thanks for reading.

2007 Year In Review

Originally posted on December 28, 2007. Reprinted with permission.


Films I Saw In General Release This Year - 2007

3:10 to Yuma

1408

Across the Universe

American Gangster

Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

Atonement

Bee Movie

Black Snake Moan

Blade Runner – The Final Cut

Blades of Glory

Bourne Ultimatum

The Brave One

Death Sentence

Eastern Promises

Evan Almighty

The Ex

Grindhouse

Ghost Rider

Gone Baby Gone

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Hot Fuzz

I Am Legend

Juno

Knocked Up

License to Wed

Lions for Lambs

Live Free or Die Hard

The Lookout

Michael Clayton

Music & Lyrics

No Country for Old Men

Ocean’s 13

Reno 911! Miami

Rocky Balboa

Sicko

Shoot ‘Em Up

The Simpsons Movie

Smokin’ Aces

Spider-Man 3

SuperBad

There Will Be Blood

TMNT

Transformers

Walk Hard – The Dewey Cox Story

Zodiac

There were plenty of good movies this year and man, I tried to see as many as I could. But I’m just going to try to tell you about as many as I can right now. Most of these are either available on DVD or still in theatres, I think maybe only a few are still in limbo. How should I break this down?

FRANCHISES?

A few movie franchises came to an end, I think, this summer. Ocean’s, Bourne, Rocky and Die Hard, were amongst the series to reportedly come to an end this year. These movies were all great, especially Ocean’s and Bourne and even Die Hard was pretty good for being PG-13. Amongst the series NOT ending, include Harry Potter, Spider-Man, Pirates, Transformers, Ninja Turtles and Shrek. Didn’t see either Shrek or Pirates because I am a grown up. Of course, I dug Harry Potter (see review) and thought it was one of the best films in that series, and am completely looking forward to Yates making Half Blood Prince. I did see Transformers and am just going on record saying that I couldn’t get involved with a movie where robots kicked the shit out of robots and no main characters dying. However, I recently discussed with a friend that if Transformers 2 is a movie about the Lesbots versus the Vagicons, then I am totally there! Oh man, that robot just knocked that other robot on its ass and it’s going down on it! This movie is awesome! I remember Transformers when I was a kid and even then, I didn’t really dig them. But, I did love TMNT. I thought it really captured the Turtles as I remember them when I was a kid. And that fight between Raph and Leo in the rain on a rooftop it one of the best fight sequences all year.

ACTIONERS?

There were some pretty terrific action movies this year and some pretty terrible one as well. I was really looking forward to Smokin’ Aces and was thoroughly disappointed in it. Piven was only in it for like ten minutes and then Alicia Keys and Common hook up for no other reason than they’re the only black people in the movie. Bourne kicked so much ass, as did Shoot ‘Em Up, but I probably Hot Fuzz would be my favorite of the year, for if Shaun of the Dead is truly a zombie comedy, then Hot Fuzz is an action movie first and a comedy second. And the only other movie to have a better final twenty minutes all year was Death Proof. Last to come down the line, but certainly not least was I Am Legend, which should have been called I Am Bitchin’ because not only was it a very serious film exploring important human and social issues, but may have established Will Smith as the finest actor of our generation. Ooh, if only we can get him in a Marty Scorsese movie!

FUNNY AS FUCK

Ok, hands down, funniest movie of the year, SuperBad. Nothing else even came close. Not even Hot Fuzz, the second funniest movie of the year. I loved Knocked Up, Bee Movie, and Reno 911! Miami but SuperBad kicked all of them in the nuts. Walk Hard was funny, but not as fine a movie as either of the other two Apatow productions. I wasn’t crazy about Evan Almighty or License to Wed but I did think they were pretty humorous. And the funniest movie I saw all year that nobody else did had to be The Ex. Jason Bateman and Zach Braff were hilarious in this movie. If you watch it on DVD, make sure you watch the theatrical version. I swear to you, the movie is goddamn hilarious. If you like Scrubs or Arrested Development, you’ll love these guys in this film, plus it features about everybody ever. Amy Poehler, Fred Armisen, Charles Grodin, Mia Farrow, Donal Logue, Paul Rudd and Josh Charles just to name a few. But back to the king shit, SuperBad was my favorite movie of the year, and I thought was just really well written, as good as Knocked Up or 40 Year Old Virgin. Fortunately, Michael Cera also showed up in the funniest of the Oscar movie of the year, Juno. This movie struck a chord between being heartfelt and hilarious that not many movies can. I absolutely loved it and everyone in it.

OSCAR KILLERS

There were just too many movies this year that are worthy of Oscar nominations and wins. Right now, the best movie of the year looks like No Country for Old Men. It was simply amazing. Javier Bardem and Josh Brolin were both brilliant and the film was gorgeous. Roger Deakins shot two beautiful pictures this year, the other being Assassination of Jesse James. Brad Pitt was great in that one, but the real performance came from Casey Affleck who tore in up in another awesome movie this year, Gone Baby Gone. The better performance in that picture was Ed Harris, who kicked so much ass, it was painful. And Ben Affleck showed that he might have some serious chops as a director. He would almost be a lock for a nod if he were not going up against a stellar roster which includes Ridley Scott, David Cronenberg, James Mangold, Robert Redford and even David Fincher. So, let’s go thru those movies quickly too. American Gangster was awesome (see review) and an almost certain nod for Denzel, probably Crowe too, but Brolin is the deserving one. Eastern Promises absolutely convinced me that Viggo Mortensen IS Russian and that Cronenberg has finally found a formula to make his movies digestible for mainstream audiences. 3:10 to Yuma could almost make Crowe compete against himself for Best Supporting Actor, but again, the great performance in the movie is Bale. Lions for Lambs will suffer from not doing well commercially and doing marginally well critically, but Tom Cruise and Meryl Streep were both excellent and deserving of a second look. Unfortunately, Zodiac probably came out far too early in the year to get some serious consideration, which is shitty because Gyllenhall, Downey and Ruffalo were all excellent in the film and Fincher made a better movie that Se7en and almost as good as Fight Club.

JUST AWFUL

I hated Across the Universe, driven mostly by my contempt for the Beatles. Ghost Rider was another awful movie, but really, really funny. I really didn’t like all but about a half hour of Death Proof, falling asleep whenever Kurt Russell was not on screen and no, the lap dance was not sexy. I wasn’t head over heels for Blades of Glory either, but Jenna Fischer and Will Arnett made it slightly watchable. I liked The Brave One but didn’t love it and felt the same way about The Simpsons Movie. Sorry gang, Family Guy forever, Simpsons never. Not going to beat up on Transformers or Smokin’ Aces anymore because neither one of them are worth it.

But Mike, you might ask, I get to see so few movies, what should I see? To which I reply, you should see whatever you want. I only write my reviews, blogs and critiques as general guidelines to help get the word out about some movies people might not have seen or even heard of in some cases. True, I write most of my reviews about bigger movies, but I always try to throw in nods and recommendations for others. There were many great films this year and I tried to see as many of them as possible. If you’re as passionate about movies as I am, you should make an effort to try to see at least one a week. Do what my friends and I do, and buy a ticket for a movie you really want to see, and after you watch it, sneak into a movie you were on the fence about. Then you can justify to yourself spending eight bucks on two movies in one night. If someone gives you shit, just tell them you’re still going to movies for the sake of art, you corporate Enron fuck!

On another note, I did get a chance to see Blade Runner on the big screen, something I simply did not get a chance to do when I was an infant. It was simply an amazing experience that I cannot even begin to describe, but one I would like to share with everyone. So, among my New Year’s resolution in looking into trying to revitalize the small locally owned and operated theatre. I want to be able to run a single screen with a hundred seats and show movies that have never played on a large screen in our lifetimes. Pretty cool, huh? Yea, we’ll see.

Top Five Films of the Year

1. No Country for Old Men

2. I Am Legend

3. SuperBad

4. Eastern Promises

5. Hot Fuzz

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Keepin' It Gangster... American Gangster



Originally posted on November 5, 2007. Reprinted with permission.


Anybody who reads my blogs or know me personally, know that I have been extremely excited about seeing this movie. Denzel and Russell Crowe together again? I loved Virtuosity! So, I went with some of my smartest friends on opening night to catch it and we were not disappointed.


This movie is not perfect, only for the simple fact that nothing is perfect. But, it comes damn close. Although Ridley Scott is mostly known for making films like Blade Runner, Alien, Gladiator and Legend, he is also the man who made Thelma & Louise and Black Rain. American Gangster is a very straight forward movie and Ridley does not put forth so much effort into the visuals of the film, (although the movie looks great) but concentrates on telling the story of the two main characters and allowing the two main actors to take over the movie. Not to say that anybody could have directed, but only someone like Scott could realize the massive talents of his cast and allow them to become the main thrust of the picture.


The title of the movie tells you right off that it's a gangster movie, (although the teenagers sitting behind me thought the movie was about Denzel being a hot cop and Russell Crowe being hot too. Hot Cops! Taking over the town!) but it is also a cop movie. Set in New York in the Seventies against the backdrop of Vietnam and the rise of heroin, the movie takes place in the same era as the great cop pictures such as French Connection and Serpico. Indeed, one would think it to be a film helmed by one of that class of directors, a Scorsese, a Lumet or a Freidkin, but this movie aspires to be more than that. And although it is not as good as the Godfather or Goodfellas, it will be a classic and inspire filmmakers and drug dealers/rappers for generations. For Denzel's Frank Lucas is a more intimidating figure than Tony Montana, Frank White or even his own Alonzo Harris. Calculating, patient and still family-oriented, Frank rises from being Bumpy Johnson's (Clarence Williams III) enforcer, to the king of New York. Surrounding himself with his family, he manages to appease the Italian Mafia, other black gangsters and his East Asian suppliers, while keeping himself and his business quiet and under the radar. And once again, his woman manages to become his downfall. It all begins with her. Lesson learned lads, lesson learned. Denzel Washington is Denzel Washington and the man gets nothing but better in every movie. It almost seems like he's having a lot of fun in this movie, playing a character unlike any other, (in Training Day, he was borderline sado-masochistic, fueling his own death.) and still managing to bring himself through the character into the performance. Conversely, Russell Crowe is simply brilliant as Richie Roberts, the Jewish cop/law student who tries to keep his clean head above water in a sea of cops on the take. While he excels at his work, his personal falls apart amid his ex-wife, his son (who you see ONCE.) and his friends, new and old, straight and criminal. And, Crowe plays all of this superbly, moving from tough talking, crazy cop, to nervous, insecure head of either the new anti-drug task force or the prosecution against Frank Lucas. Crowe is rarely seen so vulnerable, (except in A Beautiful Mind where he was paranoid schizophrenic, bi-sexual and anti-Semitic.) and he should surely garner another Oscar nod. But, his cop is not a perfect cop, stumbling through his investigation, stepping on toes and pissing people off, rather than following solid leads, but it serves to make him more human and a more likable character in a film where people are likely to root for the gangster. Both Denz and Crowe succeed in making you wonder who to root for, which in turn, makes you question yourself and your values.



And in this regard, the movie achieves far more than any other cops and robbers flick ever has. For while certain cop movies try to hit you over the head with their message and self-righteousness, while too many gangster movies fall into senseless violence and anarchy (Scarface, I'm looking at you) without making you feel for the characters, American Gangster walks the fine line between being an engaging and exciting film based on a true story while at the same time, examining the larger issues behind drugs, war, business, government and justice. And honestly, I looked past the Vietnam War mirroring our current situation in Iraq and found that, to me, the movie is a very critical commentary on capitalism, all alliteration aside.


In the film, everything is about money. Frank wants to make it and Richie fights to do the right thing amidst the temptation of it. Frank is a businessman first and maximizes his profits on a superior product. Albeit, his product is a dangerous narcotic and the opinion of that is left to the individual viewer, but never forget that behind every great fortune is a great crime. Frank Lucas wanted the American dream, hence the proper placement of the word in the title. He tried to be the black Joe Kennedy and in surrounding himself with family, he tried to ensure they would be well off for generations, "white man rich, wealthy" as he explains to them. And even though big words like monopoly and trade infringement are thrown around, the fact remains that Frank makes his money by being shrewder than the competition and working on a smaller scale the same business model than the world was beginning to use (larger inventory, streamlining production and cutting out the middleman) and that Bumpy talks about in the beginning of the film. And while it might seem that the money issues only affect Frank, Richie has his own. And not just turning in a million dollars of dirty money, but in one scene he comments on how many people would be out of work if there were no more drugs on the streets. For me, it makes perfect sense because of my belief that the government is largely responsible for the influx of illegal narcotics into this country and that they are largely fighting to regulate the traffic, rather than eliminate it. Now, go back to the Vietnam connection and say that Frank is basically a war profiteer and examine what our government is doing now to maximize the profits of their fellow stockholders in this current Iraq war. Ask yourself where's the gas rationing? Rosie the Riveter? War bonds? Can we really have our cake and eat it too? Can we afford this war much longer?



OK, back to the movie and not the socio-political implications of it. Its great, with some really kick ass action sequences. And the supporting cast is fantastic. By far, Josh Brolin is amazing, stealing the show. I loved him in Grindhouse and cannot wait for No Country for Old Men. Chiwetel Ejiofor is an actor who is outstanding in everything he's in from Children of Men to Inside Man and other films without a male derivative in the title and he gets great play in this film and Frank's brother. And I was completely surprised to discover Cuba Gooding Jr. alive and acting and able to still do both pretty damn well as Nicky Barnes, a flashy gangster version of Rod Tidwell. Also, Joe Morton, the RZA, Kevin Corrigan and Ruby Dee are all great in their smaller roles.


American Gangster was well worth the wait and I loved every minute of it. A sure fire Oscar contender and an absolute DVD purchase when it comes out, I highly recommend everyone to go see it. After I spent about thirty minutes gushing over it, I was asked it if was better than The Departed, to which I replied, "Nothing is better than The Departed." But, it comes pretty close.


American Gangster, directed by Ridley Scott, starring Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe is available on DVD from Universal.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Top Five Movie MILF's

What is it about the term or the idea of the MILF that is so arousing? It is the deeper Oedipal complex inside all of us or merely a flirtation with the forbidden and taboo? I don’t care, the MILF’s on my list are unbelievably hot.

Basically, the list came about after a long discussion with a friend about my number one. It quickly evolved into a ranking system and the explanation that the list needed to consist of women who had played roles as mothers, in films where the children figure into the story as importantly as they do.

5. Annette Benning as Carolyn Burnham in American Beauty

Not only should Mrs. Warren Beatty have won the Academy award for this role, but she looks absolutely stunning in the entire picture, outshines her younger teen counterparts and screams, “Fuck me, your Majesty!”

4. Lea Thompson as Lorraine Banes in Back to the Future

True, she does not realize that she is a mother through most of the movie, or that she will be the mother or her crush. It gets slightly confusing, but the point is she is exuding sexuality at young Marty while he tries desperately to rebuff her advances. Way to go Marty, I don’t think anybody else could have resisted.

3. Sigourney Weaver as Janey Carver in The Ice Storm

I’m not sure if it’s the rocking 70’s hair styles, the cigarette smoking or the fact that I’ve had a crush on Sigourney Weaver since Ghostbusters, but when she toys with her son’s whip on the patio, I get a warm sensation on my back that needs to be scratched. Or whipped.

2. Rachel Weisz as Rachel in About A Boy

Rachel Weisz is gorgeous and really great as a single mother in this movie and always hot when speaking without her American accent. But she is at her hottest in a deleted scene when she shows up at Hugh Grant’s door and asks him, “What would you rather do? Watch Countdown or have sex with me?”

1. Ellen Burstyn as Lois Farrow in The Last Picture Show

Why do I love Ellen Burstyn so much? I’m not really sure, but her hurt expression on the couch waiting for a date that will not come and wearing sunglasses in the convertible before flipping everybody off remains the two images from that movie that stay in my mind. Yes, more than naked Cybil Shepard. I love the film, love Ellen and will watch anything she’s in. Congrats, Ms. Burstyn, you are the hottest MILF.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Big Mike's Lil' Update 5/26/08

Wow, so much exciting stuff going on, where do I start? Weekend box office first...


-Indiana Jones ends up earning the top spot with about $151 million dollars for its grand opening. I saw it twice this weekend and stand by my review. I did also catch Son of Rambow, which was a far more enjoyable film. Check it out if you get the chance.


- News from Cannes. Che was the only movie I really want to see and it won Best Actor for Benicio Del Toro. I hope this movie gets some kind of release here as so far, nobody has made an offer on it. Of course, it will be difficult to sell, not appeal to mainstream audiences, but fuck them, I have to sit my ass in a theatre for four hours and see this movie!



- Another item from last week that got me totally stoked. Apparently, Christian Bale has signed on as John Connor for THREE Terminator films, thus creating another franchise for himself. I love Bale and think he can do anything but to know he's going to be revitalizing a childhood favorite? Why don't you just tell me Cate Blanchett is going to make three new Alien movies?! Awesomeness.


- Sadly, I just heard that Sydney Pollack has passed away from cancer. He was a terrific actor, important producer and an Oscar winning director. He was 73.




Working on a few new things that I think should drop this week on this blog, in addition to reprinting some of the old stuff and of course, any important updates along the way. Thanks for reading!

Sunday, May 25, 2008

The Untouchables - Retro Review





Originally posted January 15, 2008. Reprinted with permission.

Anybody who knows me knows that I love gangster movies. What you may not know, it that unlike Bill Murray movies, Star Wars, or cartoons, I came into them later in life. My parents were protective of me and like good parents, they actually monitored what I watched, so as a result, I was the only kid in my school that didn’t get to see Boyz N The Hood when it came out and in fact, I was not allowed to see it until I was 32. But, I fell in love with my favorite film (and my favorite director) Goodfellas when I was in high school. The Godfather, Once Upon A Time In America, Mean Streets, were all movies I saw in high school or later, as I rediscovered the great Warner classics like Public Enemy, White Heat and even last year, finally getting a copy of Howard Hawks’ Scarface on DVD. The only movie I did get to see when I was a kid, that has always been dear to my heart, was and is The Untouchables.


I watched it again last night in order to familiarize myself with it for this review and ten minutes in, I forgot I had a piece to write. The film is extremely well made, with engaging characters, fine acting, great writing and a sense of direction that moves the story along with suspense and excitement. The movie came out at a time that was dead for the genre after the financial flops of Godfather III and such films as Johnny Dangerously and Bugsy Malone. It revitalized the gangster movie and had audiences wanting more leading directly to the production of movies like my Goodfellas and Warren Beatty’s Bugsy. In addition, for being a commercially driven movie about a revisionist time in history, the almost “Wild Mid-West” era, it feels twenty years young and better than most of the movies that come out today. Coming after films that tended to glamorize the criminal lifestyle following the changing trend in gangster films after Bonnie & Clyde, it was important in re-establishing the ideas of cops and robbers in a historic context for a generation that had never seen the television series with Robert Stack.


For The Untouchables is, after all, a gangster movie about a cop. Told almost exclusively from the point of view of Eliot Ness and his team of Untouchables, one of the main themes of the film is the cop “becoming what he beheld.” I guess I am glad that I was allowed to see it when I was young, because the movie carries valuable moral lessons and asks tough questions of its audience. "What are you prepared to do? " "Never stop fighting until the fight is done." And of course, "I get NOWHERE unless the team wins". The heroes and villains are clearly defined in the movie and great pains are taken to put the audience on the side of Eliot and his team and to portray Al Capone as the charming cold-blooded criminal he actually was.


The best tool is the cast itself. Kevin Costner starred as Eliot Ness when he was mostly known for baseball movies like Bull Durham and Field of Dreams, but he had yet to break through with heavy roles in movies like JFK and Dances With Wolves. Although most people today think of him as a director and associate him with Waterworld, for a slightly older audience, Costner is a very skilled, very talented actor whose only weakness is the inability to work with an accent. (See Robin Hood-Prince of Thieves.) He plays Ness to perfection, doggedly determined, straight laced and serious and with a compassion for his family and his friends. Indeed, like most of the great actors, the Grants, the Brandos, there is very much a lot of Kevin Costmer that comes through in Eliot Ness. Andy Garcia was a fierce young actor, looking to break out and prove himself with a huge commercial hit when he took the role of George Stone, the fierce young cop, looking to prove himself on the police force. Miles removed from his well known role in the Ocean’s trilogy, he hadn’t played an action role, and hasn’t really since. Garcia slips easily into the role of Stone, a Cuban playing an Italian pretending to be a WASP. When I saw the movie when I was a kid, I only remembered Charles Martin Smith from his role in American Graffiti and was excited to see Toad as a federal agent, chasing down Al Capone. DePalma uses our preconceived notions of Smith as an actor, playing him for comic relief and making him the most likable and relatable of the group. Of course, the two stars of the film, then and now, Sean Connery and Robert DeNiro came into the movie with a history of cinema behind them, making their casting even more significant. Who better to teach the young Ness how to catch a criminal than James Bond himself? This was after Connery had stopped playing Bond for less than a decade and before he would play famous father, Dr. Henry Jones. But, nobody plays an Irish cop like the Scottish Connery and most present day impressions of Connery come directly from his performance in this film. (Yes, mine included.) The stories involving DeNiro’s involvement are legendary and accurate, from using Capone’s actual tailor, to gaining weight for the role, to the studio passing over Bob Hoskins for the role and still paying him. But, as with any film of his, all of his preparation is clear in the very small amount of time he spends on screen. Playing two of the greatest gangsters in the history of fiction and non-fiction, Al Capone is actually the role that is most dissimilar from that of Vito Corleone or even DeNiro’s personal persona. It’s so much fun to watch him play Capone as the media darling of his time, speaking to large crowds in almost every scene, when the real DeNiro is actually well known for keeping a very private personal life. In this regard, he truly stretches himself to find something we’ve never seen before.



Now, I have gone on record as not being a fan of Brian DePalma, and believe I have used the phrase “whore to Hitchcock” in describing him, but this is one of his finest films and is the result of a director who had refined his technique, working at the top of his craft. The movies does have the two DePalma signature sequences, one being the voyeur point of view shot in Malone’s apartment and the second is the straight up rip off another director’s creation, specifically, Sergei Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin Odessa steps sequence. In all fairness though, for being a director who is know for being liberal with the term “homage”, this film is probably the most parodied of all his films and certainly of any gangster movie besides The Godfather. From the baseball bat speech to the liquor raids, the film has innumerable sequences which are instantly recognizable and have made the film a modern day classic and a new standard in the genre. Since DePalma is mostly regarded for his horror and thriller films, he uses those elements carefully here, with precise, even-handed violence and, in large part to Ennio Morricone’s score, creates a element of tension that keeps moving until the final five minutes of the film.


However, I would have to throw myself off a roof with Ness pushing if I went through this entire review without mentioning the amazing script from David Mamet. Having worked with the man personally on The Unit, I can tell you that all the stories people have made up about him over the years are true. The man’s talent is immeasurable and with such classic lines as “You’re mucking with a G here pal,” and “You’re nothing but a lot of talk and a badge,” Mamet had you covered, no matter what side of the law you were on. His dialogue cuts like a knife, because he knows that’s how you get to the audience! That’s the Chicago way! Dialogue from scenes in the church, in the barber’s chair and especially Ness’ speech about bribes are classic Mamet, on par with anything in Glengarry Glen Ross. Again, for being a film so well defined about the battle between good and evil, he writes heroes you identify with and root for, while still making Capone a likable villain, but so ruthless, you cannot wait for Eliot to take him down. And that is a large part of what makes the movie great.


If you haven’t seen the movie in awhile, I implore you to watch it again. It’s such a great movie, with an easy to follow story, some humor and awesome action that it easily makes for what a friend of mine likes to call “rainy day movies.” And, if you check it out and enjoy it again, I ask for no monetary restitution, just that you check out another one of the highlighted films that you may not have seen before. Comment, post, agree, argue, debate, but above all else, watch more movies!

“Here endth the lesson.”


The Untouchables directed by Brian DePalma, starring Kevin Costner, Sean Connery and Robert DeNiro is available on DVD from Paramount Studios. Winner of one Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for Sean Connery.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Kingdom of the Crystal Sequel






I just got back from seeing Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and I feel… satisfied. I am satisfied in the knowledge that I was right. Crystal Skull was good. It was not great, but it was a good movie and I had fun. Also, because it was a midnight showing and we were let in two hours before the movie started, some people brought beach balls and my friend Robert stabbed one with a four inch knife. Little did we both know it would be so foreshadowing.


I did not have high hopes for the movie and it did not let me down at all. The subplot of the artifact and the chase for it were far fetched and implausible, but the real story was the characters and their relationships. We get a lot of information in the beginning from what Indy was doing during the war to what happened to older characters. Instead of fighting Nazis in the Great War, now Indy is battling Commies in the Cold War. And to really believe it’s the Fifties, in the first twenty minutes we get Elvis, coupes and Shia LeBeouf, looking like Brando from The Wild One, as Mutt Ravenwood. A name as ridiculous to type as it is to say. The best part of the film, like Last Crusade, is the interaction between Indy and Mutt and the movie moves swiftly to give us the two of them adventuring together through South America to find alien artifacts before the Russians do. Once the movie reintroduces Karen Allen as Marion Ravenwood, it does not stop to take a breath until the finale.


I enjoyed the movie for the all the nods to other Lucas/Spielberg movies, from the obvious Close Encounter nods to the not so obvious like Indy hiding in a refrigerator. There were the requisite Indy moments with snakes and fedoras. There were great Harrison moments like his back and forth with Marion, echoing Raiders and Empire, and saying, “I’ve got a bad feeling about this.” Cate Blanchett was excellent in her role as a KGB spy, as was the extended Jones family, Allen and LeBeouf. And I even liked how Spielberg somewhat subtly implies that the Red Scare might be the same as our current political climate. It was a fun movie and I had a great time watching it.



But, it was not without flaws. Besides the Spielberg Revisionist History 101 lesson, I was disheartened with some of the action sequences. Especially after Spielberg’s insistence they would shoot on film and do everything as practical as possible. As it turns out, not even the men behind Star Wars and Jurassic Park can do everything. The simple sequences are old school absolutely, but the more exciting sequence is very badly green screened and becomes a letdown. Once Shia and Cate pick up swords, it swiftly becomes a CGI-a-thon. For being over two hours, it seems very short, even as I desperately had to go to the bathroom at the end, when water is rushing through the temple. Ray Winstone’s double crossing friend and even the presence of the FBI agents at the beginning feel like something that could’ve been dropped from the final draft. Also, story wise, Indy and Mutt just seem to click to well together for a father and son who didn’t even know the other existed. And when Mutt remembers he has a grudge, it rings false because you can see the sheer joy and affection in his eyes both as a character and an actor.



I enjoyed the movie, but it was certainly not the best of the franchise. While I was not so quickly deflated like a beach ball, I was bummed that I had waited almost twenty years for a movie that was not so awesome. Even with Phantom Menace, I knew Vader would grow up and fight Ewan McGregor. No such luck here, unless Shia becomes Sith Lord, Darth French Beef. If he is being primed to take over as the next Indy, then forgetting his other work and going off this film alone, I would look forward to watching it. He and Harrision are the best part of the film and if they make another one with the two of them on another adventure, I bet it will be better than this. Let me know what you think out there, as I’m sure we’ll all go see it this weekend.


Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is now playing everywhere. Like, everywhere. Find a theater, it’s there.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Where Have You Gone, Jesus Shuttlesworth?

This blog was chosen as a LAMB Chop for the week of April 18-24.






While promoting the underrated 25th Hour, Edward Norton was quoted as saying he “…would play a walk on for Spike Lee.” And when asked which of Spike’s films his favorite was, his answer was He Got Game.

He Got Game was released in 1998 before Summer of Sam and after Get on the Bus, a period in between Malcolm X and Inside Man when Spike consistently directed quality movies that were largely ignored by audiences. He Got Game is the only film in that period to star Denzel Washington, but the real revelation in the film was Ray Allen as Jesus Shuttlesworth.

In his review, Roger Ebert called him “a rarity. An athlete who can act.” Ray Allen shines on the screen in many of the same ways he has for eleven seasons in the NBA with the Milwaukee Bucks, Seattle Sonics and now, the Boston Celtics. Under Lee’s direction, Allen uses pregnant pauses, minimalist dialogue and long looks in his first acting role. He is quiet and reserved. You can see the intensity in his eyes, yet he lets his game play and athletic prowess do the talking for him. And then he smiles. A big, wide smile that exudes a genuine love of the sport and explains away why the real Ray Allen spent over ten years toiling away for sub-par squads, playing his heart out and earning the hearts and respect of fans along the way.



Jesus Shuttlesworth plays ball the same way. In the movie, an ESPN piece about Jesus that features NBA players and NCAA coaches praising his virtues, could actually have been about Ray Allen. Future coach George Karl describes him as a player who “makes other players around him better.” Jesus is big and strong, but he is quick and smart. He’s the complete player, the total package, a prime time player, a diaper dandy. And, it is because the actor and character mirror each other so closely that Jesus Shuttlesworth has become iconic in the world of basketball. Never before in a sports movie have the two been equals. Did you know that the guy who played Jimmy Chitwood never played high school basketball? Jesus transcends the movie to become something of an idol that Ray Allen had to live up to. And he did as an eight-time All-Star and member of the gold medal winning Olympic team of 2000. Also in the same clip, the coaches talk about the character of the character of Jesus and the hardships he has endured, making him a better person and admirable young man they are falling over themselves to offer a full athletic scholarship to. Likewise, in his professional career, Allen has been awarded the NBA Sportsmanship award, been a spokesman for both the Jr. NBA program and the Thurgood Marshall scholarship fund, involved in numerous charities through his own Ray of Hope foundation and is held in general regard as an all around “decent human being”.



Sadly, Ray Allen has all but disappeared from the Celtic’s last playoff series against Cleveland averaging less than 10 points a game and shooting 4-for-24 from behind the 3 point line. Boston is expecting a huge turnaround from him against Detroit or the team might not make it to the NBA Finals. But, my question is, where is Jesus Shuttlesworth? Not that I’m advocating a sequel, but where are the characters like Jesus? The characters rooted in reality in both film and sports. Not since Hoop Dreams have there been such an impressive story of young men using basketball to escape their inner city plight. For every movie such as Hoosiers or Coach Carter where basketball is treated like life and talked about as a metaphor or a tool, Jesus Shuttlesworth actually uses the game as just that. We never see Jesus play a game, only pick ups and scrimmage and the movie doesn’t even end with the one-on-one game between him and his father. For Jesus, basketball is not life, life is his life. He cares about his sister, his future and his past. He talks about how his mother instilled in him an education-first mentality and he stays true to her memory. He briefly entertains the idea of going pro, and then quickly dismisses it. And throughout his college trips and recruiting speeches, there is never any talk about championship or tournaments or banners, which would suggest that although he visits fictional schools, they are stronger in academics than athletics. For Jesus, “the most important decision of his life” is not about his basketball future but about his future in the world.

When I was younger, athletes and actors were role models and people worthy of admiration and emulation. Unfortunately, more and more of those people these days are becoming caricatures of themselves and their professions. When life imitates art and art imitates life, it’s increasingly difficult to find characters on the screen like Jesus Shuttlesworth, when there are fewer athletes and actors to portray them like Ray Allen.

Save us, Jesus. Save us.



He Got Game is available on DVD from Walt Disney video.

Update - Ray Allen scored nine points as Boston won Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals and scored twenty five points in a Game 2 loss.



Monday, May 19, 2008

Big Mike's Lil' Update 5/19/08

A few news bits to run past you.

- Prince Caspian doesn't bring in $100 million or even a modest $70-80 million this weekend, managing only $66 million. Disney had hoped the Narnia movies would be their Harry Potter franchise, but I have heard that they are unsure about whether they will finish these movies. Despite the fact that production is moving on Dawn Treader, at this time, there are no plans for a fourth film. Will Caspian's performance have an impact on that decision? We'll find out.

- In more exciting news, Mary Elizabeth Winstead has been cast opposite Michael Cera in the Edgar Wright directed comic adaptation of Scott Pilgrim. Whew! Michael Cera, Edgar Wright, comics AND Winstead?! Grab the sleeping bags, because we're camping out for that bad boy. For those of you unfamiliar with Ms. Winstead from Grindhouse or Live Free and Die Hard, here she is.



- Kingdom of the Crystal Skull did not take quite the critic drubbing at Cannes that some people thought it might. More interesting though, is George Lucas' idea for another Indy movie, starring Shia "The Beef" with Harrison Ford coming back a la Sean Connery in Last Crusade. I'm holding off judgment on that until I see this new one. But I will say this. I do actually like the kid and think he can act. Check out A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints for further proof.


- Have you been following the Indy Blog-a-thon at Cerebral Mastication? There are some really great pieces getting thrown up over there. Read one of my favorites about Indy's lessons throughout the series here at Gateway Cinephiles. Damn, I was really looking for a J. Walter Weatherman joke there, but I lost it.

Damn.

Friday, May 16, 2008

Big Mike's Lil' Update 5/16/08

Just a quick update to share a few things.

- If you liked the Indy blog, please, please, PLEASE check out Cerebral Mastication, a fellow blogger's site. He is hosting an Indy blog-a-thon and I was lucky enough to be on of her first submissions. Check out his site here at Cerebral Mastication and read some of the other Indy related blogs, it's all good stuff.


- A special thanks to Graham for giving me this heads up. Here's the box art for two titles I'm really looking forward to on DVD. No release date for Sarah Connor yet, but Spaced drops on July 22.




- Also. Encore has been running the terrible, terrible Death Proof for the past couple of weeks, but today they ran Grindhouse in it's entirety. I only mention that because I have a nostalgic melancholy feeling when I think I'll never be able to watch those movies as they were intended again. Is it as bad as watching black and white movies colorized? No, but I still die a little inside.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

My Body is a Temple... OF DOOM!!!





This post is in coordination with the Indiana Jones Blog-a-thon at Cerebral Mastication.


The Indiana Jones films are generally held among the top three greatest film franchises in history. While the movies never received the critical acclaim and Academy Awards like the Godfather films or the widespread cult following and expanded universe of the Star Wars series, Indiana Jones remains one of America’s favorite heroes. Growing up, I was enamored of Harrison Ford and the dual roles of Han Solo/Indiana Jones. And my favorite film of the three remains to this day, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. Whenever I have shared my secret in the past, people ask me if I’m nuts. I reply, “I no nuts, I crazy!” Crazy for Temple of Doom, that is.


I do not understand the universal dislike for this entry in the series. It seems that people who don’t like Temple of Doom are the same people who don’t like Last Crusade, so why would they bother sticking around for a fourth film when they have been let down over sixty percent of the time? Are they Star Trek fans? Perhaps my disgruntled contemporaries are looking at the films with a far too critical eye. Personally, I choose to think of the movies of my youth with fonder memories, remembering how they impacted me then and how they influence me now. In fact, as I write this, I purposefully failed to watch the movie again, relying solely on my memory.


I’m sure now, as I think back, that my main attraction to Temple of Doom was the character of Short Round. Johnathon Ke Quan was living out my dream on screen as a tiny brown kid, running around with Indy and providing the comic relief. His presence draws kids in by being the only kid in a movie aimed at kids, yet he is now widely held in contempt as some kind if predecessor to Jar Jar Binks. One of the most remarkable things about the movie is that it IS a kid’s movie, yet it never feels like one. For a movie that people call ‘too dark’, it has more comedy in it, I think, than Raiders. Speaking of dialogue, isn’t Temple of Doom the most quotable of the Indy films? I contend that while Last Crusade is the basis for most Sean Connery impressions (including mine) and Raiders has the better script, the second movie aims for a serious tone, but is unintentionally hilarious and instead of enjoying it, I think most would prefer to criticize it. The lighter moments strive to ease the tension of the overall theme of child slavery and ritual sacrifice. Who can take any of the action and danger seriously when there’s a bunch of kids running around the place? Although the children are forced into hard labor against their will, they are never really shown being brutalized. For a mine, the place is run like boys only summer camp. It is precisely because children are the motivating element, yet removed from any real sense of harm that may rebuff adults, but attracts children. As kids, my brother and I used to love to throw the tag ‘of DOOM!’ at the end of things. Cafeteria…of DOOM! Three ring binder… of DOOM! Monthly assembly… of DOOM! Admittedly, we held few things in as much contempt as school, but we longed for fortune and glory, had no time for love and whenever we got in the car with my mother, we would tell her, “Hang on lady, we going for a ride.”



I remember watching Temple of Doom at a family gathering once when I must have been around eight. It might have been the first time I saw the film because when the servants pulled the lids of the monkey skulls and the entire table began to dig into the brains, I cracked like a whip to the bathroom and threw up dinner. After brushing my teeth, I returned, undaunted, to finish watching the movie. It was the first time a movie ever made me vomit, but certainly not the last, thank you very much Patch Adams.


Playing devil’s advocate, I understand that while I may romanticize Temple of Doom, I feel that far too many people over-romanticize Raiders. It was intended as a B movie and it generally does not try to swing for the fences. I think of it now as one of those movies that are great, but it is really just a series of scenes. Idol switching, rolling boulder, natives, plane, map, Karen Allen, baskets, pistol, bad dates, Nazis, trucks, staff room, snakes, melting face and a warehouse, there’s your movie. Sure, there’s history, pathos, action, but does Indy get possessed by the Nazis? You get a good face melting, but its Disney Channel compared to a man getting his heart ripped from his chest! The violence in this film is almost sprung from necessity as the Thugee cult is more of a religious zealotry than the fascist government of the National Socialists. Nazis hurt people for wealth and gain, while Thugees hurt people on the path to spiritual fulfillment. Complaints that the movie is too dark baffle me. Does anybody remember Empire Strikes Back? The sequel to the wildly successful Harrison Ford movie that explores real human emotions and it regarded as the best film in that series? It ends horribly with the Rebels on the run, Luke’s faith in the world shattered and no Han Solo for like the last twenty minutes! Godfather Part II was intentionally darker in nature to offset the notion that the first film glamorized the Mafia lifestyle. That movie ended up being Best Picture of the year. So, why then does Temple of Doom have such a negative stigma of being a dark movie? Perhaps, during the time of its release, only a year after Return of the Jedi, people were truly into the Eighties and growing weary of the depressing, dreary movies that had dominated the Seventies and early Eighties. They were ready for their Beverly Hills Cop, their Ghostbusters and such lighter fare that had better jokes and lighter, campy action. They would have enjoyed Raiders 2, but the filmmakers went another way, only to try to tweak the formula further in 1989.



The movies are amazingly interconnected of more levels than merely a timeline. The fact that characters rarely repeat is as significant as those who do. Karen Allen was the favorite Indy paramour and a no-brainer to return for the fourth film. However, her character in the first movie seems like an extension of Princess Leia and slightly out of place. The scenes between her and Indy are good, but they do not have the pop of the classic 1940’s film couples they were inspired by, like Bogart and Bacall. Kate Capshaw’s Willie character falls into the more established damsel in distress role with her sexual advances towards Indy, her singing career and her inability to ever save herself from peril. Their relationship has much more conflict to me, a very Moonlighting, love-hate, ‘let’s yell and slam doors when we really want to scream and tear each other apart’ dynamic. For me, the real love story in the movie is not even between Indy and Willie, but between Indy and Short Round. Foreshadowing the direction that the third movie would take, the father-son angle is obvious between the two, with Short Round idolizing Indy and Indy reluctant to embrace the father figure role, preferring Short Round as a partner and treating him like an equal. It pays off in Last Crusade when we learn of the relationship between Indy and his father, Henry and discover his father issues and most certainly will have repercussions in Crystal Skull with the reveal of his own son.


Before I seal this cavern up again, one question still perplexes me. Why does Temple of Doom play so well with animation? On my favorite cartoon Family Guy, there have been many references to Raiders, but in the Courtship of Stewie’s Father episode they end with a Temple of Doom bit that has everything from Peter and Stewie as Indy and Shirt Round and Michael Eisner falling to his DOOM! as alligator food. And let us not forget, let us not forget dude, the short lived Clerks cartoon made half of an episode a Temple of Doom homage with Randal finding himself enslaved in a underground rock quarry and held captive until Dante manages to free him and the other children.


Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom will always hold a special place in my heart, alongside other sentimental classics from my formative childhood years, such as The Right Stuff, Beetlejuice and Full Metal Jacket. I can appreciate other people’s opinions and tastes. I only wish they could do the same and understand some people like movies with lava pits, elephants and car chases that occur on rails. Don’t trash a movie because it’s not as good as you remember or expected it to be. Especially when it’s something you used to cherish and hold dear. If everybody thought like that, there would still be fist fights breaking out over the new Star Wars movies. Ok, maybe just serious showing matches, but can we not let go of our anger, realize there are more movies for us to watch, worse movies for us to get upset about and that the lightsaber fights in I, II and III are WAY cooler? I implore you, dear readers. For as a wise Chinaman once said, “You listen to me, you live longer!”



Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom is available on DVD from Paramount. Don't be a schmuck, wait until Christmas and buy all four on Blu-Ray.

Big Mike's Lil' Update 5/15/08

Quick update before the weekend hits.

- You know what I'm looking forward to that opens this weekend? Nothing. Prince Caspian is the big release, but I did not see the first one and isn't this actually the fourth book? They tried to make me read it in Catholic school, but I never got into it and didn't stay with it long enough to get to the racist and anti-Semetic stuff.

- Michael Moore has announced a follow up to Fahrenheit 9/11. Noble as it may seem , like its predecessor it will probably end up being released too late to have a serious impact on the November elections. Of course, by then President Obama will probably have us out of the war and back on the right track.

- Fox has announced their lineup for next year. 24 returns mid-season with a 2 hour prequel-ish movie, then the series movies to its regular spot. Sarah Conner Chronicles will also return this year in September. We'll see the premiere of The Cleveland Show, the Family Guy spin off starring everybody's favorite 2nd favorite black man and Sit Down, Shut Up the new animated series from Sir lord Mitch Hurwitz, creator of Arrested Development. Check it out for yourself here.

- The Encore channel as been showing The Prestige non-stop over the past week and every time I flip through, I cannot change the channel. It has not worn on me in the least and I only enjoy it more and more, still full of worry that I might eventually tire of it. Particularly, since this is my new desktop background.


- Also, I recently joined the Large Association of Movie Blogs or LAMB. I'm officially LAMB #97. Missed the century mark by this much. Check out the post and the LAMB website at LAMB #97 Big Mike's Movie Blog. Or you can click on the lamb to the right. -->

- Still another week until Indy, two weeks until The Strangers and oh God, is it still eight weeks until The Dark Knight?! I've got two things I'm looking forward to this summer. Batman and getting my new car. In that order.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles Review


Originally posted on February 20, 2008. Reprinted with permission.

One of my favorite memories of going to the movies as a kid was when my father took my brother and me to the drive-in to see T2: Judgment Day. In a time before the Internet and video blogs, we didn’t know anything about the movie. The only commercial I saw (before I learned they were called trailers.) for the movie showed an assembly line of Arnolds being created. I remember that my father had already seen the movie first, presumably to decide if his children should watch it, but my dad did not parent like that. Ask him about Full Metal Jacket. So, we were constantly bugging him, asking “Is Arnold a good guy or a bad guy, Dad?” I will love my dad forever because he kept the secret from us, letting it unfold for us on the drive-in screen and I can’t forget how excited we were when Arnold pulled a shotgun out and told John, “Get down.”

By now, the films series has generally been acknowledged as modern classics. Everybody has quoted the Terminator movies with either, “I’ll be back” or “Hasta la vista, baby” or my favorite pick-up line, “Come with me if you want to live.” I believe that the new generational gap recognizes John Connor as our savior from the robots and not Keanu Reeves. I myself often ask friends if they would rather live in post-apocalyptic world after a virus outbreak, zombie uprising or robot takeover (Probably zombies). And once, when Robert Patrick was verbally dressing me down on the set of The Unit, I almost wet myself at the fear of his finger poking through my brain. I love The Terminator movies so much I want to take them behind the middle school and get them pregnant! What’s so great about the new show then? Well, I’ll tell you. In a word, everything.

The show, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, is truly one of a kind. It takes the entire world of the film franchise and builds upon it in an extremely clever and believable fashion. Beginning a few years after the events of T2, Sarah and John have tried to assimilate into society, but go on the run again, because they have to. A new T-800 Terminator, Cameron, guides them to a time travel unit to bring them to the present year of 2007, where they continue to fight SkyNet and Judgment Day. It’s a rather simplistic concept, but it is all in the execution. Firstly, by the very premise of the show, it is greatly expanding on the different capabilities of time travel that became so commonplace in the films. In the future, John Connor is not only sending back people to protect himself, but begins to send back Resistance fighters to set up “cells” in order to try to prevent Judgment Day or at least prepare the world for it and minimize the loss of life. When the machines learn of this, they send back Terminators to hunt the Resistance cells. So, the Resistance has already begun in our own time and it is not just being fought by the Connors anymore. It is a great concept and thus enables the shows to expand beyond the core characters. But, visitors from the future are not the only new people introduced in the series. For in the past, Sarah has left behind a fiancée, played by an actor who is never in a bad show, Dean Winters (Oz and Rescue Me) and an FBI agent who finds that the longer he tracks Sarah, the more he begins to uncover evidence that her story about robots from the future might not be wrong.

Let’s return to the core characters for a moment. Lena Headley plays Sarah, still as tough and protective as ever, but we begin to see her more as a woman and not just a mother. She has her own needs that she continues to put aside for the safety of her son. Of course, she is still conflicted between believing in her son and trusting her son. John, played by Thomas Dekker, finds himself isolated from other people and wondering how he will be able to be a great leader if he doesn’t even have any friends in high school. However, he does show the promise of the future John Connor by taking risks and sometime forcing his decisions on his mother, which usually turn out to be the right ones. I really like the mother-son dynamic in the show, especially when they are just mother and son and not the Twin Terrors to Terminators. Speaking of which, Summer Glau plays the hottest Terminator yet, but like Arnold in T2, she is learning from her human companions and adopting mannerisms and speech patterns from them. This provides some laughs, but also some serious moments and serves the greater theme that the movies only hinted at. It is the idea that the machines are the invention of their creators and therefore, are enabled or limited by us. To put it another way, would the machines have decided to exterminate humankind if we did not have a self-destructive history? They could not have learned to create or terminate by themselves; it had to be taught by their programmers. Of all the characters, John is the only one who sees them for what they are. Terminators are tools and John was the one who used them to help humans and fight the machines. While Sarah still has a resistance to anything metal, John finds ways for Cameron to help them even when neither of the women can see a solution.



Last week’s episode showed us the future and introduced more ideas about the machines and humans, hinting that not everyone is what they seem. This is a classic story telling device to create suspense and it is working, but only for the fact that I want to see HOW they work it. For the Terminator universe does have some rules, which this show is abiding to.

1. Nothing goes thru.

2. There is no fate, but what we make for ourselves.

3. John Connor is infallible. In the future, John does not make mistakes with time travel or the fate of humanity.

So, if the show’s creators are presenting the idea that the people from the future might have ulterior motives in the present, I’m not worried. Because John Connor sent them back, so John Connor must know what they would do. A few episodes ago, Sarah spoke of how much John learned from chess. While she mentioned it in a different context, it stands to reason that John Connor is in the future, moving people through time like pieces on a chessboard and thinking five moves ahead of the machines. Not that this idea of mine about John has anything to do with car chases or robots throwing each other through walls, but I wanted to share with you how well done the show is that can sustain an idea or conversation such as this. Even 24 (a favorite) is pretty straight forward after awhile, but Terminator plays with a pre-existing universe even better than say The Clone Wars cartoons. The show could have easily been a weak continuation of the movies with a sexier robot, but they are doing something much different. The characters inhabit James Cameron‘s world, yes, but they also inhabit a our world and face real issues such as depression and suicide, unfulfilled sexual desires and the most honest reflection of 9/11 that I have ever seen. It is really a show about a dysfunctional family unit. However, unlike most families, they aren’t concerned with their own lives, but with the world around them and making sure that they’re lives are spent trying to make it a safer world. In a time when the widely popular Presidential candidate tells us that we can change the world, if we have the will and hope to do it, those keywords are what motivate the Connors every week to try to save a world that is heading to extinction and is not even aware of it. John and Sarah are not fighting the machines to save their own lives, but in order to save all of ours. There’s something noble about that which appeals to me and makes for great TV.



Since the original posting of this blog, FOX has confirmed that the show will return in the fall for a second season and that Brian Austin Green will be a series regular.

Big Mike's Lil' Update 5/14/08

I have decided to be more proactive with my blog as way of giving more to my readers, yes both of you. So today, we begin with the informal updates and I will try to keep them up daily, every other daily, you know.


- So, Speed Racer bombed. Does this mean The Matrix was really lightning in a bottle for the W's? The sequels weren't as impressive and they've not done anything since. Bummer, chummer.

- It seems like McSpaced might be a no go. For those of you not hip to the hip talk, that is the derogatory name for the American version of the British show Spaced, the creation of Simon Pegg, Jessica Stevenson and Edgar Wright. Briefly, remember how when they made the American The Office and Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant were executive producers and involved in every step of the process? Yea, well, this what the opposite of that.

- Still waiting for a trailer for Zack and Miri which Kev Smith has been promising for a week or so. Why do I love that man? Is it because he's awesome?

- Blog news. Umm, yea. Reprinting of the Sarah Connor Chronicles review, cause I love it so much. (The show not my own writing!) And in anticipation of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Menace, I wrote a retro piece on Temple of Doom, which should be up on Friday.


That's it for now. What the news in your neck of the woods?

-Mike

Friday, May 9, 2008

My Top Ten Beauties in Black and White

I love films in black and white. As much as some scholars used to believe that silent movies were superior to those with sound, with every passing year my affinity for classic black and white films grows stronger. I feel like there was a greater emphasis on the image then and most starlets of the time had a favorite director of photography that would be the only one allowed to film them. Hollywood lore is full of tales of actresses carrying on affairs with their cameramen instead of directors or actors. Whatever the dynamic in the relationship, it did capture some of the most beautiful women in the world on film forever. With this blog, I present to you a loving tribute of my top ten favorites.



10. Carla Gugino in Sin City (2005)

This is more of a special mention since the film was released in 2005, but not only has Carla Gugino been smoldering hot since Son in Law, in this movie she commits fully to the character as originally conceived in the graphic novel, which is more than I can say for other actresses in the film. *cough JessicaAlba



9. Tracy Reed in Dr. Strangelove (1964)

As Ms. Scott, the only woman in the cast of one of my favorite movies of all time, Tracy Reed on this list is a bit of an indulgence. But, she is simply stunning in her bikini and again in her Playboy spread that the crew admires on the B-52 bomber.




8. Jane Russell in The Outlaw (1943)

She may have exuded more sex appeal later in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, but in this picture her ample assets defied the Hays Code, caused the Motion Picture Censor Board to demand cuts in the film (as depicted in The Aviator), was banned in several states, got theater owners arrested for indecency after playing it, had Howard Hughes designing custom brassieres and made Ms. Russell a star.



7. Rita Hayworth in Gilda (1946)

We all know that Rita Hayworth was a Latina and that she was the first poster purchased by Andy Dufrense up in the ‘Shank, but did you know she gave birth to Orson Welles’ baby just before filming this movie and before that was the first choice to star in Casablanca?




6. Teri Garr in Young Frankenstein (1974)

This might be my favorite movie of all time and every time I watch it, I cannot decide who is better looking, Teri Garr or Madeline Kahn? I bit the bullet and cast my vote for Teri, because she never looked better in anything else she did and Madeline had more to do in Paper Moon.



5. Audrey Hepburn

Sabrina, Roman Holiday, Funny Face, who can decide? Regardless of your personal preference, Audrey remains one of the most beautiful women ever to shine on the silver screen and became immortalized by hipsters and teeny boppers to this day. And I have to choose Sabrina, even though she won the Oscar for Roman Holiday.



4. Anita Ekberg in La Dolce Vita (1960)

In one of the most influential films ever, Anita captivated audiences all over the world and was practically canonized in Italy, even though she was a native Swede. A classic beauty, she set the standard for such Europeans actresses to follow including Monica Bellucci and Eva Green.



3. Ingrid Bergman

In spite of being the most attractive nun ever in The Bells of St. Mary, how many other movies do we remember her from? Casablanca? Notorious? But, to truly understand and appreciate the beauty of Ingrid, you have to watch her films with Rossellini, which she considered her best work.




2. Natalie Wood in Love with a Proper Stranger (1963)

I have been in love with Natalie Wood since I was twelve years old and watched her in West Side Story. I fell in love with her all over again a few months back when I caught her in this movie opposite Steve McQueen. She was gorgeous, talented and taken from us far too soon.



1. Marilyn Monroe in Some Like It Hot (1959)

Yes, she was a troubled woman creating a troubled production in the midst of her troubled marriage. But, through sheer screen presence and charisma, Marilyn turned her most memorable performance in one of the most beloved films of all time. She was the penultimate sex symbol, the Blonde Bombshell, but above all else, she took her craft seriously and studied under Lee Strasberg at The Actor’s Studio, in order to be thought of as more than just a pretty face.

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Southland Tales - DVD Review




Originally posted on March 26, 2008. Reprinted with permission.

I normally don’t review DVD’s, as usually I have seen a movie upon its theatrical release and then written about said movie at that time. In the case of Southland Tales, it had a very limited run and I didn’t get a chance to see it in theaters. Also, determined as I may have thought, I also failed to read the three graphic novels that preceded the film in the storyline of the film. I was very interested to see this movie nonetheless. It was the second film from Richard Kelly, writer and director of Donnie Darko. Starring The Rock and Stifler in a futuristic, dark comedy/sci-fi movie (with a love story and a musical number) about the end of the world, I referred to it as Total Rundown, never guessing how that movie would parallel this. The movie had a disastrous screening at Cannes two years ago and has been engulfed in rumors ever since. To be fair, not every film in progress shown at Cannes is Apocalypse Now. Some films get the Brown Bunny treatment. Critically panned, Kelly labored another year in post production to trim the film and work on many of the effects shots. However, I’m sure that neither the running time nor the look of the picture are what turned people off, it had to be the story.


Southland Tales is a film about the state of America in 2008 after terrorists detonate a nuclear bomb over Texas. Meanwhile, the war on terrorism is being fought on three new fronts besides Iraq, bringing back the draft. While oil prices soar, new energy sources are being developed to better fuel the America’s fighting machines. And as the Republican-led government begins to take tighter control over it citizens, while trying to win the electoral votes in the crucial state of California, cells of resistance fighters begin to crop up and take measures to fight back. All these plotlines figure very heavily into the narrative, are centralized in Los Angeles and explained in the first ten minutes of the movie. Then the focus shifts to two characters. Boxer Santaros is a movie star, who wakes up with amnesia and starts to figure out what happened to him, while he researches for his upcoming role as a cop in movie he wrote, which tells the story of the end of the world, as he has imagined it. He teams up with Officer Roland Taverner, who is being used by the resistance to stage a murder for political purposes by impersonating his brother, a police officer. As Boxer is trying to figure out the difference between what he knows and what he is told, by his wife, the daughter of a US Senator and by Krysta Now, the porn star that has been caring for him, Roland searches for his brother. And the entire movie is narrated by Justin Timberlake, as a Bible-quoting veteran from Iraq. Ironically, it takes almost as much time to explain the movie as it does to watch it.



To get the basics out of the way, it is a finely made film. Dwayne Johnson, the Rock, is as you have never seen him, simply amazing. Alternately cool and cowardly, his character of Boxer seems to channel Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry, Mel Gibson in Conspiracy Theory and even elements of his former WWE personality, carrying this entire film on his tatted up shoulders. If it’s any indication of the kind of roles he would like to take on, he had a great career ahead of him. Similarly, Seann William Scott is fantastic as Roland/Ronald, proving that the dude really can act. He has much of the film’s heavy work at the end and plays it great. The rest of the cast including Mandy Moore, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Justin Timberlake and Nora Dunn are excellent as well. And Kelly casts a number of lesser seen actors like Curtis Armstrong, Christopher Lambert and Wallace Shawn and a multi decade reunion of SNL players including Amy Poehler, Cheri Oteri, Jon Lovitz and a ‘blink and you miss her’ Janeane Garafalo. The film looks amazing as well, with the new money from Sony wisely spent on effects that do not seem like an alternate future, merely a very close one. But as I said, I don’t think people had a problem with any of this.


The film is foremost a political satire, as Kelly states. It questions not only government in general, but the Bush administration specifically, the war in Iraq and its young veterans, environmental concerns, the entertainment industry, religion and faith, sex, drugs and anarchy. Underneath that is a story about two men who become inadvertently involved in a tear in the very metaphysical fabric of the universe, bringing with it inexplicable weather phenomenon, time travel, geothermic energy sources, the collapse of the fourth dimension, the end of the world, sex, drugs and anarchy! Is it a convoluted labyrinth of a screenplay? Absolutely. Should we have expected anything less from the director of the movie about the time-traveling teenage superhero in the 80’s who is guided on his journey by a six foot tall bunny? Absolutely not. In this time of cookie cutter summer blockbusters, by the number romantic comedies, dreadful dreck posing as parody and unbelievably absurd message movies, isn’t I nice to know a director can still go Michael Cimino on that ass? Sure, it is huge and ambitious and slightly taken with itself, but who has the brass to make a film that strays from the norm and dares to present a radically different point of view? Who uses wrestlers, pop singers, improv comics and a vampire slayer to tell a story of despair, dissent and destruction? Who else would openly attack the government methods behind surveillance, the voting process, the energy crisis, homeland security and the war on terror? Besides Kelly, there’s only George Clooney and he’s too busy taking care of Darfur to direct another good night, and good luck. That, dear readers, is courage that should be admired.



Furthermore, Kelly has said that the movie requires repeat viewings, which is not a selling point necessarily, but something that inspired the cult of Darko and also makes classics of such films as Blade Runner, which tends to be under appreciated in their own time. The problem here is not with Kelly, but with audiences and, admittedly, with critics. Even before Internet, the rise of the movie critic, particularly in film, had overcome the scholars and theorists of film. Reviews can help or hurt a movie, but there was a time when film criticism was considered an integral part of the film society and the creative process, and not merely a part of the marketing campaign for the movie. People with no knowledge of Bazin, Sarris or Kael can easily use blogs, message boards, newspapers and radio to spread their infectious and often inaccurate critique of a film o people who know even less than them. Therein, it becomes a larger issue with how audiences react to what they are presented. It is easy to dismiss a film as confusing and therefore, stupid or bad. It’s easy to say one doesn’t like it and not have a significant reason to defend their stance. I, on the other hand, can find many reasons to dislike any number of films, some of which is viciously dislike. Which is not to disparage someone’s taste, for some people like Coke, some people like Pepsi. But, if I find a film confusing, I don’t lay blame on the film, but on myself. What am I not getting about the movie that is escaping me? For if you believe as I do, that cinema exists as an art form that an artist, or group of artists in film, creates in order to express themselves, their emotions and ideas. We are all humans, living and sharing this world for as long as Richard Kelly thinks, and if one person can explain who they are through a painting, a poem or a film, surely the rest of us can tap into the common human experience and discover what they are trying to say? You and I must dig deeper and find the truth behind the words and colors and sounds to explore another side of the prism. Because to deny yourself the chance to experience something new, is to deny the very purpose of life.



Southland Tales directed by Richard Kelly, starring Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson, Sarah Michelle Gellar and Seann William Scott is available on DVD from Sony Pictures.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Iron Man Review


Iron Man will not disappoint. Neither comic fans, nor the casual moviegoer will find fault with the finished film. It combines action, pathos and comedy in a way not normally found in a ‘comic book’ movie. I should go on record as saying that I believe Sin City to be the ultimate comic book movie, I thought Batman Begins was perfection and Spider-Man sucked. All three times. Iron Man learns from its predecessors and effectively bridges the gaps in creating a film that not only appeals to all audiences, but never feels like its sacrificing its integrity in order to so. Its serious subject matter, intense fight sequences and witty dialogue all weave together seamlessly in a tapestry that was even better than I had expected.

Opening in Afghanistan, billionaire weapon designer Tony Stark is captured by men using his own arms against him. They force him to build a new missile system for them, but he constructs a suit for himself in order to escape. When he makes his way back home, he decides to stop building bombs and begins to try to protect the people he has spent his life putting into harms way for money.

I do not want to dwell on the plot, because although it is a very well written story, there is so much more going on with the film. The story simply serves to let the actors shine. Robert Downey Jr. stars as Tony Stark and he shines brighter than ever. He’s in complete control here, blending his personal style of acting, his public persona and the core elements of the character to deliver a fantastic performance superior to anything you’ve ever seen from a superhero. Downey and Stark are like Nicholson and McMurphy in Cuckoo’s Nest. You don’t know where one begins and the other ends because they fit each other so well. Downey and his character are both moving past a checkered past with eyes open, trying to better themselves, better their world and finding it less easy than expected, but infinitely more rewarding as well.



For me personally, I have been waiting for this movie for quite a long time. Last summer when footage was screened at Comic-Con and the movie began to build hype, I was dealing with my own problems with alcoholism and found immeasurable inspiration in not only the story of Tony Stark, but in that of Robert Downey Jr. as well. One year later, as Downey is reaping the benefits of his long road back for addiction to the heights of stardom and critical acclaim, I find myself in a better position as well and experienced an indescribable joy as the movie opened.

To return to the film, yes, Downey carries the movie, but the supporting cast is excellent. Both Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Potts and Jeff Bridges as Obidiah Stane are great with what they’re given and although Terrence Howard as James Rhodes doesn’t have as much business, he’s play his part well, knowing that he is being set up for bigger things in the eventual sequels. But, the other half of the credit of this movie belongs solely to Jon Favreau.

A long time favorite hyphenate, writer-director-actor Favreau steps out of the comfortable position of making such family fare as Elf and Zathura and makes an amazing action debut. The flying sequences are better than anything I’ve seen since Top Gun and the fight sequences with Tony in both the Mark I and the Mark III suit are incredible. Like his leading man, Favs is awesomely adept at balancing the practical effects with the computer animation to create scenes that flow effortlessly and have audiences focusing on the action, rather than watching to see where its really the actor in screen and where its not. The movie does not really on the action, but Favs paces it well enough for those scenes to really pay off and be meaningful enough to involve the audience, actually moving the plot forward unlike some other Marvel movies I could name. (Or you can name them yourself, because you know which ones I’m talking about.) The dialogue scenes between Downey and the rest of the cast snap with his quick delivery. Favreau approaches the film in a straightforward manner rarely seen in comic books movies. More adult in its tone than Spider-Man but less dark and heavy than Batman Begins, it’s like the third bowl of porridge. The movie is just right with a story of substance and relevance in a world where often heroes are fighting villains from outer space or people with such nefarious plans like drowning the world. Stark in not a superhero, but a regular man who builds a super suit, so Favs places him in a normal world without superheroes. They play against a lot of superhero conventions to satisfying ends, but the movie works so well because of the director’s choice to ground it in reality and work with his imperfect protagonist in an imperfect world.



As of this writing, Iron Man opened to approximately $104 million dollars in the States and grossed $200 million worldwide. That makes it the 2nd biggest opening ever for a non-sequel, 4th biggest comic book opening and 10th largest opening weekend EVER. I tip my head in appreciation and congratulation to Favreau, Downey and the entire cast and crew. Of course, this is great news for me, because it means a sequel, probably a trilogy and even more movies for me to enjoy. Thanks again!